Bloedd

I ddathlu Mis Balchder eleni, bydd rhai o'n cynhyrchwyr amgueddfa cymru anhygoel yn cynnal gweithdai ar thema Balchder ar draws rhai o'n hamgueddfeydd ym mis Mehefin. Fel rhan o'r dathliad hwnnw, gofynnon ni iddyn nhw fyfyrio ar y themâu a'r ysbrydoliaeth y tu ôl i'w gweithdy a'r hyn y mae Balchder yn ei olygu iddyn nhw.

Y Gweithdy: Torri, Adfer, Ymadfer 

Mae mis Balchder yn fwy na dathliad – mae hefyd yn gyfnod o adfer. Amser i ganfod llonyddwch. Amser i hawlio eto ein lle – yn y byd o'n cwmpas a'r byd y tu fewn i ni. Mae fy ngweithdy Toredig ond Prydferth yn byw yn y bwlch hwnnw lle mae mynegiant creadigol ac ymadfer personol yn cwrdd – lle nad yw darnau'n deilchion ond yn ddeunydd i greu rhywbeth newydd. ⁠ 

Dechreuodd y project hwn yn ystod fy mlwyddyn olaf, yn dilyn siwrnai bersonol yn darganfod hunaniaeth, adferiad a gwytnwch. Roedd yn fwy na phroject – daeth yn fodd o ddeall y byd a'n lle ni ynddo. Gydag amser fe dyfodd yn weithred gydweithredol ddofn: gweithdy lle gall pobl dorri gwrthrych cerameg a'i ailadeiladu gyda chlai. Mae harddwch hynod yn y broses hon – catharsis, llonyddwch a nerth tawel. 

Ar ddiwedd fy nghyfnod preswyl fe ysgrifennais flog trylwyr ar gyfer Cynfas yn esbonio sut y tyfodd Toredig ond Prydferth o'r project terfynol a'n siwrnai bersonol. 

Felly, pan ddes i â Toredig ond Prydferth i Amgueddfa Genedlaethol y Glannau ar gyfer Mis Balchder eleni doeddwn i ddim yn cyflwyno rhywbeth newydd. Roeddwn i'n creu lle i bobl eraill brofi'r hyn wnes i: y rhyddid o dorri ac ailadeiladu, o ymollwng, ac o greu rhywbeth newydd gyda gofal. 

Yn ystod y gweithdy bydd pobl yn dewis gwrthrychau, eu torri'n ofalus, a chymryd amser yn ailadeiladu'r darnau yn feddylgar. Byth yr un peth, ond eto’n llawn ystyr. Y cyfan i gyfeiliant seiniau cerameg yn tincial yn y cefndir, nid dinistr ond dihangfa. 

Darnau o Hanes: Gweithiau Wnaeth fy Nghyffwrdd 

Wrth fyfyrio ar y gwaith hwn fe dreuliais i amser yn edrych drwy gasgliad LHDTC+ Amgueddfa Cymru. Roedd rhai gweithiau yn arbennig yn cyffwrdd â fi – Cwpan, Llestr Theatr a Tebot Estynedig gan Angus Suttie (1946-1993). Pan welais i Menywod Llangollen – Dillwyn a Llestri Hufen gan Paul Scott, fe stopiais i. Fe rewais i am eiliad. Roeddwn i'n teimlo fy mod i wedi canfod stori oedd ddim angen gweiddi i gael ei chlywed.

Mae'r gwaith – hambwrdd pren yn llawn darnau cerameg – fel map o’r cof. Cwpwrdd atgofion. Mae pob llafn o grochenwaith glas a gwyn yn gip ar le ac amser, serch a chwalfa. Nid casgliad cerameg yw hwn, ond tirlun o emosiwn. Rhyw archif dawel. Fel artist a churadur yn ymdrin â themâu hunaniaeth ac adfer, roeddwn i'n uniaethu'n syth gyda gwaith Paul Scott. 

Adferwn, nid i guddio’r graith, ond

i'w holrhain a'i dyrchafu. Er chwalu'r 

gorffennol – daliwn bob darn fel 

atgof o'r gwanwyn. 

Mae'r cyfeiriad at Fenywod Llangollen – Eleanor Butler a Sarah Ponsonby – yn haen dyner arall. Dwy fenyw a heriodd ddisgwyliadau'r 18eg ganrif, gan gydfyw mewn cyfeillgarwch rhamantus a throi eu cartref yn hafan i wybodusion, artistiaid a meddylwyr yr oes. Byddwn yn aml yn rhamantu eu hanes, ond yma yng ngwaith Paul Scott mae'n real. Yn gyffredin. Darnau o fywyd bob dydd y cartref a'r platiau, y cwpanau, a'r llestri hufen yn orlawn o atgofion, agosatrwydd, a safiad cwiar.

Y peth mwyaf teimladwy i fi yw nad yw'r gwaith yn ceisio 'trwsio' unrhyw beth. ⁠Nid yw'r darnau toredig wedi eu cuddio neu eu gorfodi i'w ffurf wreiddiol. ⁠Maen nhw wedi'u fframio. Eu dal. Eu hailddehongli. Ac mae urddas tawel yn hynny. Safiad tawel sy'n dweud mwy o wirionedd nag unrhyw adferiad. 

I mi mae Menywod Llangollen yn adleisio bwriad Toredig ond Prydferth: nid i guddio'r creithiau ond i'w dyrchafu. Nid i geisio adfer rhywbeth i'w ffurf wreiddiol, ond gadael iddo dyfu'n rhywbeth arall – rhywbeth sy'n adrodd gwirionedd ei stori. 

Yn y weithred hon – o greu nid o guddio – mae grym y gwaith. 

Perthyn drwy Greu 

Drwy Amgueddfa Cymru rydw i wedi cal cyfle i ddod i nabod Bloedd ⁠– rhaglen dan arweiniad pobl ifanc i ddyrchafu lleisiau LHDTC+ ar draws Cymru. Os ydych chi'n berson ifanc, mae lle yn Bloedd i chi. I greu, i siarad, i berthyn. 

Dros Fis Balchder eleni rydw i'n dathlu mwy na hunaniaeth. Dwi'n dathlu'r nerth tawel mae'n ei gymryd i adfer, a nerth cydweithio. 

Mae cymaint mwy i'r gweithdai hyn na chreadigrwydd. ⁠Maen nhw'n llefydd i fyfyrio, bodoli a gwella. Hyd yn oed yn deilchion, rydyn ni’n un darn. 

Cynhyrchwyr Amgueddfa Cymru yw grwp pobl ifanc rhwng 16 – 25 oed sy’n byw yng Nghymru a chydweithio gyda’r Amgueddfa drwy gyfleoedd cyfranogol a chyflogedig.

Hwn yw lle i ddyfnhau gwybodaeth a sicrhau bod mannau treftadaeth a diwyllianol yn fwy cynrychioliadol o’r bobl ifanc a’u diwylliannai niferus sy’n byw yng Nghymru neu o Gymru. Rydyn ni yma i wneud treftadaeth yn berthnasol.

Rydyn yn edrych ar gelf, treftadaeth a hunaniaeth, amgylcheddaeth, gwyddorau naturiol, hanes cymdeithasol ac archaeoleg drwy ein casgliadau a chyd-cynhyrchu digwyddiadau, gweithdai, arddangosfeydd, cyfryngau digidol cyhoeddiadau, grwpiau datblygu a mwy! Mae ein Cynhyrchwyr Amgueddfa Cymru yn gweithio’n agos gydag adrannau ar draws yr Amgueddfa i'n helpu ni ddyfnhau cynrychiolaeth yn ein casgliadau a rhaglenni, i adlewyrchu pob cymuned yng Nghymru. Mae hyn yn cynnwys ehangu ein casgliadau LHDTC+, dad-drefedigaethu ein casgliadau a chasglu hanesion llafar ar hanes dosbarth gweithiol. Gall Cynhyrchwyr Amgueddfa Cymru hefyd ddod â’u syniadau neu bynciau y hoffen nhw archwilio trwy ein casgliadau!

Cofrestrwch ar gyfer ein rhestr bost i glywed am gyfleoedd ar draws yr Amgueddfa yma.

Cewch gysylltu drwy e-bostio bloedd.ac@amgueddfacymru.ac.uk. Dilynwch ni ar Instagram i gael y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am Bloedd!

Who are you? How and why did you join Demystifying Acquisitions? 

My name is Abraham Makanjuola, I am originally from London and I work as a Health Economist for Bangor University. During my masters, I was working with the Sub-Sahara Advisory Panel (SSAP) on a documentary about narratives about the African Continent from the perspective of people from the diaspora linked with the UK. Following the release of this, I was approached about being involved with filming behind the scenes content for Demystifying Acquisitions. I was initially not sure, because I didn’t know what I had of value to offer the project, but I was met with encouragement and that helped me make my decision. I think that was one of the best decisions I’ve made in my life to date. 

How did you find the overall experience of working for Demystifying Acquisitions? 

It was sensational, I would do it all over again exactly as it has played out. I genuinely have nothing negative to say and there aren’t any glaring issues that require addressing from my perspective. I think that is a testament to the people I was blessed enough to work with. I have enjoyed myself and learned so much over the past couple of years and I am grateful to all involved. 

What set of skills did you gain while working on the project? 

Specific to new museum knowledge, I learned about the conservation of artwork, how the bid and grant writing process works, and how to write labels for artworks in galleries. Wider softer skills I was able to develop were teamwork and collaboration, and project management. 

What was your favourite part of working on the project? 

My favourite part was being a part of the install day of the redisplay, I even got to put up one of the works which was cool. Prior to this day though, my favourite part was learning about label writing. Did you feel listened to? Were you able to influence or change things? What instance? Throughout the process we were given complete autonomy and were encouraged and supported with our group decisions. With this support we were able to respect museum practices but also shake things up and challenge how things have previously been done. We did have push back for certain decisions we made but there was always mutual understanding and respect.


 

1 Corinthians 12 introduces its readers to the lasting image of the fledging church as a physical body – each part with different but important roles to fulfil. This metaphor has endured for centuries, and is a challenging one for many Christians today, who struggle with things like hard denominational boundaries and tribal us/them attitudes. For Fr. Ruth, a queer priest in the Church in Wales (CiW), it has a similarly challenging but uplifting message. 

Ruth is a curate (trainee vicar) in the Islwyn Ministry Area in the Diocese of Monmouth, and she’s part of a team that looks after twelve different churches up and down the Gwent Valleys. She’s also bisexual, gender-non-conforming, and in a civil partnership with her spouse, Hannah. In addition to her ministry in the CiW, Ruth is one of four Pastoral Leaders of an ecumenical LGBTQ+ church in Cardiff called The Gathering. 

If that surprises you, that’s okay. But, despite what you may have been taught, queer people have always been a part of the life of the church. We have always been vicars, ministers, deacons, worship leaders, caretakers, congregants, youth group leaders. We are a part of the heritage and life of the church in a way that has, for too long, been overlooked and brushed aside.

The Anglican Church, in particular the Church of England, is undergoing a real reckoning at the moment over the issue of blessing same-sex marriages. The CiW has already had this conversation, and voted in 2021 to bless the marriages of same-sex couples. Whilst, for many, this does not go far enough, it is generally seen as a good first step, and it sets a precedent for other Anglican churches also having this discussion. It also puts those campaigning for marriage equality in a really good position for the Church in Wales to formally allow the sacramental celebration of marriage (hopefully) soon. The current position is bittersweet for many, though. As Fr. Ruth explained to me: “When the current legislation passed, that was a huge change for the Church in Wales. But I felt quite conflicted about it. In part, I am delighted that we can offer something to people for whom the church have been offering nothing. But, in part, it feels like a half-hearted step, where, what you're saying is ‘we're going to recognise that these relationships are good and holy and that God can bless them, but we're not willing to offer you the sacrament of marriage’. It feels theologically incomplete. And it's hurtful, as a queer person in a relationship, to know that the sacrament of marriage is withheld from us.”

It is still a huge deal, though, especially when you consider the length of Christian history that we were completely excluded from the public life of the church. We were still there, though, in closets and in the background, and I like to find queerness reflected in artwork throughout Christian history. It’s forever fascinating to me the ways in which artists, for hundreds of years, have been interpreting biblical stories in ways that we, as audience members and critics, can see the homoerotic. In this artwork, we can see ourselves reflected; here, in the shadow of gender transgression, there, in the hint towards homoeroticism. Indeed, for many artists throughout history, the only acceptable outlet for them to express their homoerotic desires was to displace them through artistic interpretations of ‘safe’ stories and figures – biblical scenes and characters. For example, artwork depicting the martyrdom of St. Sebastian is almost always homoerotic – after all, an attractive young man, mostly naked, is often depicted as being penetrated by arrows.

For Ruth, the ways in which she honours her place in the Church, and where she sees herself in the heritage of the church, is through the practise of the Eucharist. A useful image for her in thinking about the Eucharist is that of a human heart. “During the Eucharist, the church is like the chambers of the heart. It draws in that which needs nourishment. In the movement of the Eucharist, the nourishment is received, like blood going out to the lungs and coming back again, and then it's sent back out into the rest of its community.” So, when Jesus says, at the Last Supper, “Do this in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19, NRSV), and we partake in this remembrance, we become a part of something bigger than us – an invisible string that stretches back centuries, connecting everyone across the world that’s ever remembered Jesus’ life in this way, like branches of a nervous system spanning time and space and holding us together. In this act of remembrance, “in becoming the body of Christ, all of the boundaries get blurry. So we become parts of a whole. That requires all of our differences.” It requires our differences in sexuality and gender identity, and how we interact with the world around us as embodied creatures. “As someone who the church historically would have said ‘we have no need of you’, I find it really, really heartening that those who still wish queer folks weren’t in ministry can't say ‘we have no need of you’. Because here we stand within the sacramental honours of the life of the church. You cannot say to me: I have no need of you. The challenging side is, I can't say to them I have no need of them either. We are brought together in that wholeness. And that wholeness is of God and so it's not up to us to say we have no need of one another.”

In a world full of divisive individualism, rituals like a Eucharist serve as an important reminder that we are a part of a much, much larger whole. The human body is an ecosystem of multitudinous grace, apathy, compassion and anger – never just one thing, always many interlinking feelings and experiences and beliefs. And, if a single human body is an ecosystem, how vast must the ecosystems of our societies be? Another word for Eucharist is Communion. This is the term that I grew up with in my faith tradition, and it holds both a special and fraught place in my heart because of it. The obvious reason behind it being called Communion is that it is through this ritual that we commune with God – we honour Jesus’ life and death, and are in communion with something greater than ourselves. But, through the connections and interconnections of this action, are we not also in communion with one another? Are we not then, in spite of all the things that separate us, one body? 

 ‘Indeed, the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot would say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. […] If the whole body were an eye, where would the hearing be? If the whole body were hearing, where would the sense of smell be? But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single member, where would the body be? As it is, there are many members yet one body. The eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” […] If one member suffers, all suffer together with it; if one member is honoured, all rejoice together with it.’ (1 Cor. 12:12-26, NRSV). 

When it came to writing this article, my thought space had been taken to the theme of journeys; the unknown ground between a beginning and an ending. My journey as a young producer for Bloedd’s latest project, an LGBTQIA+ oral histories exhibition, has been a nearly yearlong one. What began as conversation in a shared space containing mutual interests and passions, defined the nucleus of my work here. The beginnings of this time had been an unpacking of what we felt as a collective was important to represent for an upcoming exhibition. We knew from the jump that we wanted to represent voices that may often go unheard; those whose experience may not be recounted upon by the mainstream perception of what it means to live an LGBTQIA+ life. 

Moving away from the typical portrait of queerness being a thrown brick in protest, that while important, we are more than our fight for freedoms; our stories can be found in the everyday, in the places we visit, the jobs we keep, the people we love and share our lives with. The given name of this exhibition, Ours to Tell, came only after we had completed our collection of stories, the self-described journey we undertook over several months of visits and interviews, holding dialogue with well over fifty years of experience. But what is in a name? Ours to Tell is a reclamation. It’s our way of saying “here is a story, told by a firsthand account of the storyteller”. It’s our way of saying “these words are cut from a book hidden away in the attic of my mind. I’ve ventured into the attic, and I’m dusting it off for you.” It’s our way of saying “this is where I come from”. 

While the journey of this project has been underpinned by a great deal of planning and preparation, what you can’t prepare for is what you might uncover in someone else’s story. You commit to the routine of presenting a series of questions, from you to the storyteller, with only a table between you. It comes as a surprise the level of detail, which is excavated by the storyteller, they are like a hoarder being handed a stepladder, invited to dig up their stowed away possessions from the attic. Your questions are prompts: “when did you first see your identity reflected in someone else?”, “what does a safe space look like to you?”, the list goes on. The exciting part is that you don’t know what’s coming next, and you are there, alongside the storyteller, who guides you through a journey which may well bring up a familiarity or nostalgia for the listener. During these times when I’ve had the great pleasure to listen to these stories, I can confidently say that I have felt every kind of emotion in response. I laughed. I have cried. I have been moved. I have been taken on a journey.

Enabling the participants of this project to confidently speak about their experiences has proved an undeniable joy, though I cannot understate how this project has affected those coordinating its launch. Fellow young producer Joss Copeman, like me had been drawn to this exciting opportunity, Copeman’s “personal work is largely centred around queer narratives and themes of identity and the self.” The journey which unfolded from Ours to Tell has been greatly beneficial, as it pertains to young LGBTQIA+ creatives and makers, taking inspiration from unheard voices, now affected and transformed by echoes of their experience. This is a feeling I know will resonate with the audience, and I can only hope it will stir others in future, to share what might be put away, gathering dust in the attic. 

I’d like to conclude with a quote that shook me like a cat in a tree, “Art is not just for oneself, not just a marker of one’s own understanding. It is also a map for those who follow after us.”

Written by Ivy Kelly, Amgueddfa Cymru Producer (Bloedd).

Bloedd is the platform for youth engagement at Amgueddfa Cymru.

With the festive season upon us, it's important to consider the privilege it is to be able to celebrate in a time of major conflict and global issues and what part we can play that offers positive steps forward in supporting those most affected across the world.

Because of my background in character design and puppetry, I'm often interested in working on a human scale, perhaps by creating characters or puppets. That's why I thought of designing a workshop where participants create flat figures representing individuals making pledges. The idea was also that these figures could facilitate debates or conversations, symbolising our commitments and exploring scales and proportions. Initially, I even wanted to provide time and space within the workshop for participants to use their characters to discuss their pledges. Inspired by puppetry, participants would embody their characters and articulate their ideas, creating a sense of accountability and encouraging action.

When I think or talk about urgent topics like those that inspired the works exhibited at the Arts Mundi exhibition, I'm always mindful that real people are involved in these massive issues. These individuals might not always be engaged in politics, but they are inevitably affected by it.

While we may feel overwhelmed by the urgency and scale of these issues, as people, we can also use our voices and actions to make pledges - that is the thought behind the title of the workshop ‘People’s Pledges’.

When we did the workshop at Cardiff National Museum during February half term, conversations revolved around being kind to each other, protecting our environment, people protesting on the streets, the right to protest, being open to learning about other cultures, being kind to people in our support circle, anti-consumerism behaviours, and the climate crisis…

Originally designed for adults and intended for the LATES event at the museum, we were unsure about how children and families would respond… It was mostly successful, with some parents engaging in conversations with their children as they designed their characters. However, some parents opted not to participate, thinking that the workshop as mostly for children but the workshop was originally planned with adults in mind. This workshop is open to all ages and everyone is welcome to participate!

We hope to facilitate the workshop again, possibly in an outreach setting, as it creates a great opportunity to discuss how we can effect change and take action in our daily lives. Perhaps we could build a whole community of small characters making pledges marching towards action?!